WASHINGTON: Previous studies found that fewer than 40 per cent of patients with stable chest pain who underwent invasive coronary angiography had obstructive coronary artery disease. Recent randomized clinical trials have shown that evaluating these patients first with computed tomography angiography (CTA) is beneficial, and a new study presented at the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Summit supports this strategy, finding that CT was associated with a higher likelihood of revascularization when compared to other imaging modalities or no testing.
Stable angina is a type of chest discomfort that occurs when the heart muscle requires more oxygen than usual, such as under stress, exercise, or cold weather, but does not receive it, which is commonly caused by blocked coronary arteries. Patients with stable angina are normally treated with guideline-directed pharmaceutical medication and lifestyle changes, but they may also require a coronary revascularization procedure to restore adequate blood flow and relieve their symptoms.
“Right now, when a patient presents to their primary care physician or cardiologist with symptoms suspicious for angina, they are commonly referred for additional testing,” said Markus Scherer, MD, Director of Cardiac CT and Structural Heart Imaging at Atrium Health-Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute and the study’s senior author.
Between October 2022 and June 2023, researchers at Atrium Health-Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute in Charlotte, North Carolina, assessed 786 patients who had no prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease and underwent elective invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for the evaluation of suspected angina. The pre-ICA testing strategies were: no noninvasive testing with direct referral to ICA (44%), stress echocardiogram (3%), stress myocardial perfusion imaging (15%), stress MRI (2%) and coronary CTA (36%). The study cohort had a mean age of 66 years, was 63% male, 37% female, 81% White, 13% Black, 1% Asian, 1 per cent Hispanic and 1 per cent other.
The researchers compared rates of subsequent revascularization between patients whose initial evaluation was coronary CTA versus stress testing or clinical judgement (no testing). The “CT first” strategy was associated with subsequent revascularization in 62 per cent of patients compared to 34 per cent for the combination of other modalities or direct ICA referral.
The 2021 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain suggests either non-invasive functional imaging or coronary CTA as the initial test without specifying a preference for one or the other.
According to the researchers, there are a multitude of reasons health systems don’t currently use a CT first approach, including the availability of high-quality CT scanners; availability of qualified cardiac CT interpreting physicians; and challenges in transitioning to a newer approach after decades of pre-established patterns (i.e. stress testing). Furthermore, a CT first approach is predominately advocated for patients with unestablished coronary artery disease and does not apply to all, as some patient factors may reduce the accuracy and utility of coronary CTA.
“While care must be individualized, for patients with unknown or unestablished coronary artery disease, the transition to a ‘CT first’ strategy should be a high priority for cardiovascular care providers,” Scherer said. “The non-invasive approach has a lower risk and cost than a diagnostic heart catheterization and, for the CT approach–but not stress testing–provides information on the absence, presence and extent of coronary atherosclerosis and whether or not there are high risk plaques as well as vessel blockages, which helps streamline patient management and risk reduction.”
Since coronary CTA is less expensive than both nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and ICA, there is a direct cost saving to patients and third-party payers with the CT first approach, according to Scherer. From the perspective of a health system, the most financially efficient evaluation approach becomes more important during the transition to a value-oriented health care system.
According to the authors, the study demonstrates “real world” credence to the randomized trials showing similar benefits to a “CT first” strategy and should promote increased adoption of this strategy for the evaluation of patients with chest pain and an unestablished history of coronary artery disease.
“Cardiac catheterization labs are a capital and human resource intensive care environment. Using them for their maximum potential of treating disease, rather than diagnosing it, bring the highest yield for these resources to the health care system,” Scherer said.



Leave a Reply